Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to WEBTOON Entertainment Inc.
How WEBTOON Entertainment Inc. stacks up
WBTN · against 146 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
37/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #105 of 147 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including WBTN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 37?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- The loss per share widened. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 8.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 67% of peers. Revenue growth: -0.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 71% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.6% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WBTN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WBTN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 149 reported | -0.5% | 5.8% | 24% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | Not reported | 9.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 8.6% | 4.7% | 67% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WBTN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.6B USD | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 2 | 36.6B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 685M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 672M USD | 98 | 46 | |
| 101 | 4.6B USD | 40 | 39 | |
| 101 | 3.9B USD | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score