Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Weibo Corporation
How Weibo Corporation stacks up
WB · against 128 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 129 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including WB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 19.2% vs peer median 2.9%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 97% of peers. EBITDA yield: 61.2% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | 19.2% | 2.3% | 98% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 61.2% | 8.1% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 55 reported | Not reported | 8.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 264.6% | 45.2% | 98% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.9B USD | 94 | 79 | |
| 4 | 44.34T IDR (≈$2.7B) | 92 | 58 | |
| 5 | 29.5B ZAR (≈$1.6B) | 91 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score