Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Waters Corporation
How Waters Corporation stacks up
WAT · against 61 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
71/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #17 of 62 · scores higher than 70% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including WAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 71?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -84.7% vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 75% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 15.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 90% of peers. Revenue growth: 52.5% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 62 reported | 52.5% | 10.9% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 49 reported | -84.7% | 14.8% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 62 reported | 15.8% | 8.2% | 80% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 22.8B USD | 95 | 38 | |
| 3 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 4 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 5 | 43.30T KRW (≈$31.2B) | 86 | 68 | |
| 15 | 193.6B HKD (≈$24.8B) | 74 | 78 | |
| 16 | 63.0B USD | 73 | 65 | |
| 17 | 177.2B HKD (≈$22.7B) | 71 | 73 | |
| 17 | 27.8B USD | 71 | 55 | |
| 17 | 45.2B USD | 71 | 46 | |
| 20 | 49.1B USD | 69 | 69 | |
| 21 | 34.6B USD | 68 | 58 | |
| 22 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 64 | 75 | |
| 22 | 78.1B USD | 64 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score