Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Voyager Therapeutics, Inc.
How Voyager Therapeutics, Inc. stacks up
VYGR · against 97 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
10/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #85 of 98 · scores higher than 11% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including VYGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 10?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -43.9% vs peer median 5.8%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 90% of peers. Revenue growth: -19.1% vs peer median 6.1%
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VYGR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VYGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 104 reported | -19.1% | 4.9% | 12% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 33 reported | Not reported | 5.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 96 reported | -43.9% | 2.8% | 2% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VYGR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 1 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 90M USD | 99 | 27 | |
| 1 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 83 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 11 | 41 | |
| 83 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score