Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ventas, Inc.
How Ventas, Inc. stacks up
VTR · against 15 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
17/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #16 of 16 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including VTR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.5% vs peer median 6.5%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.6% vs peer median 5.3%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.1% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VTR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VTR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 16 reported | 0.6% | 3.4% | 0% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 15 reported | 4.1% | 4.8% | 7% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 13 reported | 2.4% | 4.5% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 15 reported | 32.8% | 40.0% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VTR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.9B USD | 77 | 78 | |
| 2 | 54.4B USD | 48 | 57 | |
| 3 | 4.28T JPY (≈$29.1B) | 46 | 47 | |
| 4 | 84.3B USD | 45 | 56 | |
| 5 | 87.3B USD | 43 | 55 | |
| 12 | 56.1B AUD (≈$37.0B) | 29 | 70 | |
| 13 | 34.7B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 14 | 68.1B USD | 19 | 33 | |
| 14 | 48.0B USD | 19 | 44 | |
| 16 | 44.6B USD | 17 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score