Ranked #214 of 237 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
18 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including VIRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 11?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 88% of peers. Return on assets: 0.3% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 100% of peers. Return on equity: 4.5% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VIRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
VIRT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 214 reported
Not reported
10.9%
—
—
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 38 reported
51.6%
16.7%
92%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 237 reported
0.3%
1.2%
9%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 236 reported
53.6%
10.6%
100%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 247 reported
65.8%
0.0%
82%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
