Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VIR · against 424 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #305 of 425 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score121 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including VIR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | VIR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 412 reported | -15.8% | 1.8% | 9% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 424 reported | -18.4% | 4.5% | 6% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 195 reported | -10.7% | -0.4% | 16% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 414 reported | 44.9% | 35.3% | 63% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21.3B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 14.2B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.9B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 1 | 226.3B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 40.2B MXN (≈$2.2B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 305 | 1.3B USD | 8 | 44 | |
| 305 | 1.5B USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 305 | 1.7B USD | 8 | 31 | |
| 305 | 2.2B USD | 8 | 35 | |
| 305 | 1.9B USD | 8 | 42 | |
| 305 | 2.8B USD | 8 | 51 | |
| 305 | 2.0B USD | 8 | 29 | |
| 305 | 3.7B USD | 8 | 28 | |
| 305 | 2.3B USD | 8 | 27 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score