Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VIPS · against 257 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #91 of 258 · scores higher than 65% of peers · safety percentile 57
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)33 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including VIPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | VIPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 248 reported | 0.24× | 0.60× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 252 reported | 0.64 | 0.85 | 67% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 250 reported | 1.28× | 1.49× | 38% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 5 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 87 | 25.1B HKD (≈$3.2B) | 58 | 45 | |
| 88 | 27.3B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 58 | 72 | |
| 89 | 5.1B USD | 57 | 59 | |
| 90 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 57 | 53 | |
| 91 | 6.2B USD | 57 | 69 | |
| 92 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 57 | 61 | |
| 93 | 1.00T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 56 | 77 | |
| 94 | 681.8B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 56 | 50 | |
| 95 | 7.5B EUR (≈$8.2B) | 55 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score