Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VIAV · against 273 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #217 of 274 · scores higher than 21% of peers · safety percentile 19
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)33 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including VIAV · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | VIAV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 265 reported | 0.48× | 0.33× | 39% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 259 reported | 1.23 | 1.04 | 34% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 272 reported | 1.85× | 1.77× | 55% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 5 | 27.4B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 213 | 122.6B TWD (≈$3.8B) | 20 | 23 | |
| 214 | 7.9B USD | 19 | 16 | |
| 215 | 4.4B USD | 19 | 45 | |
| 216 | 46.2B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 19 | 45 | |
| 217 | 7.4B USD | 19 | 36 | |
| 218 | 10.3B EUR (≈$11.3B) | 19 | 52 | |
| 219 | 7.19T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 18 | 48 | |
| 220 | 5.6B USD | 18 | 24 | |
| 221 | 155.5B TWD (≈$4.8B) | 18 | 33 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score