Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VBNK · against 249 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #179 of 250 · scores higher than 28% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score43 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including VBNK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on equity and return on assets, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | VBNK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 238 reported | 284.8% | 10.4% | 97% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 35 reported | Not reported | 9.3% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 252 reported | 0.5% | 1.1% | 26% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 250 reported | 6.2% | 10.5% | 29% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 266 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 192.8B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 47 | |
| 1 | 98.7B JPY (≈$671M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 92 | |
| 4 | 1.4B USD | 97 | 91 | |
| 5 | 16.3B THB (≈$458M) | 96 | 71 | |
| 177 | 1.2B USD | 19 | 47 | |
| 177 | 857M AUD (≈$566M) | 19 | 23 | |
| 179 | 159.2B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 18 | 42 | |
| 179 | 197.4B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 18 | 55 | |
| 179 | 714M USD | 18 | 9 | |
| 182 | 31.1B TWD (≈$965M) | 17 | 37 | |
| 182 | 109.2B JPY (≈$743M) | 17 | 59 | |
| 182 | 408M USD | 17 | 43 | |
| 182 | 14.3B THB (≈$400M) | 17 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score