Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Vale S.A.
How Vale S.A. stacks up
VALE · against 47 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
21/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #46 of 48 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score2 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including VALE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 21?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -61.9% vs peer median 9.4%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -4.3% vs peer median -0.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.9% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VALE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VALE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 48 reported | 0.9% | 7.8% | 19% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 40 reported | -61.9% | 59.7% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 48 reported | -4.3% | 3.0% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VALE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 47.9B EUR (≈$52.7B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 53.3B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 486.3B MXN (≈$26.3B) | 98 | 91 | |
| 4 | 30.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 42 | 2.15T TWD (≈$66.6B) | 39 | 36 | |
| 43 | 45.9B EUR (≈$50.5B) | 32 | 39 | |
| 44 | 69.7B USD | 31 | 19 | |
| 45 | 24.4B USD | 27 | 28 | |
| 46 | 46.7B USD | 21 | 53 | |
| 47 | 142.3B SAR (≈$38.4B) | 17 | 44 | |
| 48 | 39.8B GBP (≈$51.8B) | 16 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score