Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Energy Fuels Inc.
How Energy Fuels Inc. stacks up
UUUU · against 117 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 118 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including UUUU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 95% of peers. Revenue growth: 62.5% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 98% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 52.9% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UUUU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UUUU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 121 reported | 62.5% | 1.5% | 94% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 84 reported | Not reported | -10.2% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 117 reported | 52.9% | -0.8% | 97% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UUUU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 5 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 5 | 22.3B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 95 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score