Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Universal Technical Institute, Inc.
How Universal Technical Institute, Inc. stacks up
UTI · against 245 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
29/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #175 of 246 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including UTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield, EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.9% vs peer median 6.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 69% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 8.7%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.9% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UTI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 236 reported | 2.8% | 4.6% | 30% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 248 reported | 5.9% | 9.1% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | -2.3% | 7.0% | 6% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 233 reported | 28.8% | 56.8% | 15% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UTI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 2 | 87.0B INR (≈$1.0B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 29.73T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 4 | 933M USD | 97 | 84 | |
| 5 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 96 | 60 | |
| 170 | 6.6B CNY (≈$928M) | 31 | 36 | |
| 173 | 15.8B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 30 | 59 | |
| 173 | 125.6B INR (≈$1.5B) | 30 | 65 | |
| 175 | 4.7B CNY (≈$661M) | 29 | 44 | |
| 175 | 1.2B USD | 29 | 40 | |
| 177 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 28 | 53 | |
| 177 | 9.0B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 28 | 55 | |
| 177 | 5.2B HKD (≈$659M) | 28 | 58 | |
| 177 | 7.1B CNY (≈$989M) | 28 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score