Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UTI · against 246 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #228 of 247 · scores higher than 8% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including UTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 239 reported | 1.04× | 0.35× | 16% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 240 reported | 1.17 | 0.34 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 238 reported | 1.30× | 1.71× | 35% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.5B CNY (≈$632M) | 99 | 28 | |
| 4 | 6.6B HKD (≈$843M) | 99 | 78 | |
| 5 | 10.77T IDR (≈$668M) | 99 | 82 | |
| 224 | 12.7B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 17 | 15 | |
| 225 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 50.5B THB (≈$1.4B) |
| 16 |
| 35 |
| 226 | 1.5B AUD (≈$982M) | 15 | 20 |
| 227 | 5.6B CNY (≈$783M) | 14 | 29 |
| 228 | 1.2B USD | 14 | 40 |
| 229 | 2.1B USD | 13 | 16 |
| 230 | 1.1B USD | 13 | 67 |
| 231 | 688M USD | 12 | 25 |
| 232 | 10.2B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 12 | 34 |