Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
How United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. stacks up
USLM · against 319 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Profitability
98/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 320 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score53 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including USLM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 98?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 95% of peers. Operating margin: 42.1% vs peer median 7.6%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 95% of peers. Return on invested capital: 42.8% vs peer median 6.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 97% of peers. Return on assets: 18.0% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = USLM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | USLM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 307 reported | 42.8% | 9.0% | 94% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 315 reported | 42.1% | 9.6% | 93% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 292 reported | 18.0% | 3.7% | 93% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 290 reported | 21.4% | 9.1% | 82% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 323 reported | 55.3% | 25.8% | 87% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around USLM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 387.1B INR (≈$4.6B) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 49.8B HKD (≈$6.4B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 2 | 29.0B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 2 | 8.2B CAD (≈$6.0B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 2 | 73.0B MXN (≈$3.9B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 6.0B CAD (≈$4.4B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 2 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 3.5B USD | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 2 | 3.5B USD | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 3.7B AUD (≈$2.4B) | 98 | 84 | |
| 2 | 3.7B CAD (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 95 | |
| 15 | 5.8B AUD (≈$3.8B) | 97 | 71 | |
| 15 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 97 | 79 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score