Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to US Foods Holding Corp.
How US Foods Holding Corp. stacks up
USFD · against 75 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 76 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including USFD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 2.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 37.0% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = USFD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | USFD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 76 reported | 3.8% | 3.7% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 65 reported | 37.0% | 2.3% | 88% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 75 reported | 4.7% | 3.8% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around USFD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.33T JPY (≈$15.8B) | 91 | 68 | |
| 2 | 18.2B USD | 90 | 43 | |
| 2 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 90 | 71 | |
| 4 | 12.9B USD | 89 | 62 | |
| 5 | 148.0B DKK (≈$22.2B) | 88 | 56 | |
| 21 | 43.3B USD | 69 | 63 | |
| 22 | 1.19T INR (≈$14.2B) | 68 | 60 | |
| 23 | 13.8B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 23 | 21.1B EUR (≈$23.2B) | 67 | 54 | |
| 23 | 21.9B USD | 67 | 40 | |
| 26 | 25.9B USD | 66 | 53 | |
| 27 | 13.7B USD | 65 | 51 | |
| 28 | 24.5B USD | 62 | 52 | |
| 28 | 15.2B USD | 62 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score