Ranked #38 of 64 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
13 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including USB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
●Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 1.1% vs peer median 1.2%
●Return on equity is close to the peer norm. Return on equity: 12.1% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = USB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
USB
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 48 reported
9.5%
13.5%
34%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 5 reported
Not reported
46.0%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 64 reported
1.1%
0.9%
57%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 64 reported
12.6%
14.3%
32%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 67 reported
0.0%
0.0%
0%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
