Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to USA Compression Partners, LP
How USA Compression Partners, LP stacks up
USAC · against 123 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 124 · scores higher than 37% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score13 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including USAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 5.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.1% vs peer median 12.1%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 67% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.3% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = USAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | USAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 121 reported | 4.2% | 5.1% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 10.2% | 13.2% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | 8.3% | 6.0% | 64% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 121 reported | 7.7% | 55.6% | 3% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around USAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 68.4B THB (≈$1.9B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 4 | 31.65T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 96 | 53 | |
| 73 | 7.3B USD | 41 | 43 | |
| 75 | 4.9B USD | 40 | 42 | |
| 76 | 42.1B CNY (≈$5.9B) | 39 | 30 | |
| 76 | 4.5B USD | 39 | 44 | |
| 76 | 3.7B USD | 39 | 48 | |
| 79 | 44.3B CNY (≈$6.2B) | 38 | 35 | |
| 80 | 5.5B USD | 37 | 51 | |
| 80 | 4.3B CAD (≈$3.1B) | 37 | 59 | |
| 80 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 37 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score