Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UPS · against 64 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #55 of 65 · scores higher than 16% of peers · safety percentile 10
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including UPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 63 reported | 1.90× | 0.73× | 11% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 64 reported | 1.05 | 0.96 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 64 reported | 1.18× | 1.16× | 52% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 2 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 3 | 318.3B DKK (≈$47.7B) | 68 | 45 | |
| 4 | 101.3B USD | 66 | 65 | |
| 5 | 11.30T JPY (≈$76.8B) | 61 | 51 | |
| 51 | 179.5B USD | 12 | 35 | |
| 52 | 76.6B USD | 11 | 42 | |
| 53 | 49.7B USD | 11 | 50 | |
| 54 | 71.0B USD | 10 | 68 | |
| 55 | 92.9B USD | 10 | 41 | |
| 56 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 10 | 59 | |
| 57 | 94.0B USD | 9 | 44 | |
| 58 | 93.8B USD | 9 | 47 | |
| 59 | 68.5B USD | 8 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score