Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Urban One, Inc.
How Urban One, Inc. stacks up
UONEK · against 8 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Valuation
26/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #6 of 9 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score1 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including UONEK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -417.6% vs peer median 2.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.8% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UONEK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UONEK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | -417.6% | -87.0% | 33% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 6.8% | 10.0% | 45% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 8 reported | -4.6% | 22.0% | 29% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 9 reported | 142.0% | 269.7% | 25% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UONEK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 2 | 62M MYR (≈$14M) | 93 | 57 | |
| 2 | 289.2B IDR (≈$18M) | 93 | 47 | |
| 4 | 32.3B KRW (≈$23M) | 89 | 49 | |
| 5 | 28M USD | 88 | 46 | |
| 6 | 17M USD | 26 | 19 | |
| 7 | 18M SGD (≈$13M) | 2 | ||
| 8 | 25.5B KRW (≈$18M) | 0 | 26 | |
| 8 | 12M USD | 0 | 6 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score