Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Union Pacific Corporation
How Union Pacific Corporation stacks up
UNP · against 29 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
45/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #7 of 30 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including UNP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.1% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.6% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UNP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UNP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 4.1% | 3.2% | 83% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 6.2% | 5.0% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 26 reported | 3.6% | 3.7% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 10.8% | 12.5% | 45% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UNP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.15T CNY (≈$161.5B) | 79 | 79 | |
| 2 | 92.9B USD | 60 | 41 | |
| 3 | 22.15T JPY (≈$150.6B) | 54 | 60 | |
| 4 | 101.3B USD | 52 | 65 | |
| 4 | 147.5B USD | 52 | 54 | |
| 6 | 15.68T JPY (≈$106.6B) | 48 | 41 | |
| 7 | 180.3B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 8 | 91.3B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 9 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 43 | 51 | |
| 9 | 210.5B EUR (≈$231.5B) | 43 | 43 | |
| 9 | 93.8B USD | 43 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score