Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UNM · against 175 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #122 of 176 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score20 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including UNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | UNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 176 reported | 4.7% | 8.1% | 15% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 49 reported | 7.7% | 9.0% | 38% | Context only | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | 4.8% | 8.7% | 34% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 172 reported | 75.0% | 75.2% | 50% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 134.4B HKD (≈$17.2B) | 98 | 44 | |
| 1 | 65.1B HKD (≈$8.3B) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 64.2B HKD (≈$8.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 4 | 169.0B HKD (≈$21.6B) | 97 | ||
| 5 | 73.3B HKD (≈$9.4B) | 95 | 54 | |
| 120 | 12.7B USD | 27 | 59 | |
| 120 | 14.6B USD | 27 | 64 | |
| 122 | 12.1B EUR (≈$13.4B) | 26 | 51 | |
| 122 | 16.7B EUR (≈$18.3B) | 26 | 51 | |
| 122 | 14.4B USD | 26 | 19 | |
| 122 | 9.3B USD | 26 | 40 | |
| 126 | 7.8B GBP (≈$10.2B) | 25 | 42 | |
| 126 | 11.1B USD | 25 | 11 | |
| 126 | 15.0B USD | 25 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score