Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UMC · against 97 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #45 of 98 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including UMC · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 94 reported | 0.14× | 0.32× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 94 reported | 1.70 | 1.22 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 97 reported | 2.17× | 1.73× | 66% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 3 | 40.5B USD | 91 | 75 | |
| 4 | 28.4B USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 5 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 41 | 195.0B BRL (≈$35.1B) | 46 | 73 | |
| 42 | 24.1B USD | 45 | 48 | |
| 43 | 8.73T JPY (≈$59.4B) | 44 | 44 | |
| 44 | 42.1B USD | 41 | 69 | |
| 45 | 41.1B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 46 | 51.9B USD | 41 | 63 | |
| 47 | 39.2B USD | 38 | 51 | |
| 48 | 293.4B SEK (≈$29.3B) | 38 | 52 | |
| 49 | 63.6B USD | 38 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score