Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Unusual Machines, Inc.
How Unusual Machines, Inc. stacks up
UMAC · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #69 of 479 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score87 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including UMAC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Still loss-making, but the loss per share narrowed. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: 313.6% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UMAC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UMAC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 313.6% | 13.1% | 98% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | Not reported | 22.4% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | Not reported | 9.7% | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UMAC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 69 | 18.0B USD | 91 | 58 | |
| 69 | 881M USD | 91 | 43 | |
| 69 | 10.1B USD | 91 | 72 | |
| 69 | 19.4B USD | 91 | 63 | |
| 69 | 730M USD | 91 | 50 | |
| 69 | 742M USD | 91 | 61 | |
| 81 | 2.8B USD | 90 | 66 | |
| 81 | 11.6B USD | 90 | 57 | |
| 81 | 1.5B USD | 90 | 84 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score