Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ULCC · against 473 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #468 of 474 · scores higher than 1% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)82 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including ULCC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ULCC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 451 reported | 38.54× | 0.63× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 430 reported | 2.57 | 1.12 | 3% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 473 reported | 0.58× | 1.79× | 3% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 209M USD | 100 | 46 | |
| 4 | 402M USD | 100 | 39 | |
| 5 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 466 | 1.5B USD | 1 | 62 | |
| 467 | 1.2B USD | 1 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 13 |
| 468 | 316M USD | 1 | 31 |
| 468 | 738M USD | 1 | 22 |
| 468 | 1.5B USD | 1 | 15 |
| 468 | 116M USD | 1 | 6 |
| 472 | 2.3B USD | 0 | 48 |
| 472 | 461M USD | 0 |
| 472 | 183M USD | 0 | 13 |