Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ubiquiti Inc.
How Ubiquiti Inc. stacks up
UI · against 119 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #75 of 120 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including UI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.7% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.9% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 120 reported | 2.9% | 3.2% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 117 reported | 3.7% | 5.0% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 2.8% | 3.1% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 114 reported | 3.6% | 17.0% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20.1B USD | 94 | 68 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 93 | 93 | |
| 70 | 24.9B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 72 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 50 | 75 | |
| 72 | 45.7B USD | 50 | 34 | |
| 74 | 47.5B USD | 49 | 39 | |
| 75 | 33.0B USD | 48 | 74 | |
| 76 | 3.47T JPY (≈$23.6B) | 47 | 47 | |
| 77 | 179.4B CNY (≈$25.1B) | 46 | 61 | |
| 77 | 29.6B USD | 46 | 39 | |
| 79 | 35.1B EUR (≈$38.7B) | 45 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score