Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Universal Health Realty Income Trust
How Universal Health Realty Income Trust stacks up
UHT · against 227 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #94 of 228 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including UHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.1% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.1% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 247 reported | 3.6% | 5.5% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 229 reported | 7.2% | 5.6% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 9.1% | 9.2% | 49% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 252 reported | 27.2% | 118.5% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 90 | 536M USD | 66 | 27 | |
| 90 | 816M EUR (≈$898M) | 66 | 56 | |
| 92 | 7.2B SEK (≈$720M) | 65 | 56 | |
| 92 | 24.8B THB (≈$694M) | 65 | 39 | |
| 94 | 530M USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 95 | 350M EUR (≈$385M) | 63 | 58 | |
| 95 | 384M CHF (≈$442M) | 63 | 53 | |
| 95 | 1.2B SGD (≈$928M) | 63 | 74 | |
| 98 | 2.6B HKD (≈$333M) | 62 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score