Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Universal Health Realty Income Trust
How Universal Health Realty Income Trust stacks up
UHT · against 256 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #87 of 257 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score25 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including UHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 35.3% vs peer median 26.8%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 75% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.4% vs peer median 3.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 76% of peers. Return on assets: 3.4% vs peer median 2.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 251 reported | 5.4% | 3.2% | 75% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 246 reported | 35.3% | 24.7% | 61% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 249 reported | 3.4% | 2.1% | 77% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 248 reported | 12.5% | 4.9% | 87% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 258 reported | 94.4% | 50.8% | 93% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 310M USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 678M AUD (≈$447M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 59.8B JPY (≈$406M) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.3B HKD (≈$418M) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 249M GBP (≈$323M) | 98 | 73 | |
| 84 | 6.9B SEK (≈$685M) | 68 | 41 | |
| 84 | 563M USD | 68 | 45 | |
| 84 | 391M EUR (≈$430M) | 68 | 69 | |
| 87 | 329M EUR (≈$362M) | 67 | 47 | |
| 87 | 530M USD | 67 | 62 | |
| 89 | 1.1B SGD (≈$808M) | 66 | 41 | |
| 90 | 1.1B AUD (≈$737M) | 65 | 52 | |
| 90 | 4.1B SEK (≈$412M) | 65 | 67 | |
| 90 | 309M EUR (≈$340M) | 65 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score