Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Universal Health Services, Inc.
How Universal Health Services, Inc. stacks up
UHS · against 160 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
96/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 161 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including UHS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 96?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 90% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.0% vs peer median 0.0%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 93% of peers. EBITDA yield: 17.5% vs peer median 4.0%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 97% of peers. Earnings yield: 14.4% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UHS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UHS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 160 reported | 13.8% | 2.5% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 160 reported | 17.2% | 4.7% | 99% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 96 reported | 7.8% | 2.2% | 95% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 159 reported | 72.0% | 18.8% | 94% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UHS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 2 | 89.5B HKD (≈$11.5B) | 98 | 67 | |
| 3 | 10.4B USD | 96 | 64 | |
| 4 | 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) | 95 | 76 | |
| 5 | 11.6B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 5 | 68.0B BRL (≈$12.2B) | 94 | 67 | |
| 7 | 1.09T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 93 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score