Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to UFP Technologies, Inc.
How UFP Technologies, Inc. stacks up
UFPT · against 356 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #164 of 357 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score47 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including UFPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.3% vs peer median 9.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 78% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 17.8% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UFPT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UFPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 357 reported | 7.3% | 6.9% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 205 reported | 7.3% | 10.0% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 349 reported | 17.8% | 8.4% | 75% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UFPT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 2 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 27.6B SEK (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 158 | 3.2B USD | 61 | 65 | |
| 158 | 1.6B USD | 61 | 51 | |
| 158 | 151.7B INR (≈$1.8B) | 61 | 61 | |
| 164 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 36 | |
| 164 | 2.2B USD | 60 | 61 | |
| 164 | 303.5B INR (≈$3.6B) | 60 | 47 | |
| 167 | 427.8B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 59 | 52 | |
| 167 | 1.2B CHF (≈$1.4B) | 59 | 34 | |
| 167 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score