Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Uranium Energy Corp.
How Uranium Energy Corp. stacks up
UEC · against 124 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
2/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #123 of 125 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including UEC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -3.9% vs peer median 12.1%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -3.7% vs peer median 5.2%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -2.9% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UEC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UEC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | -3.7% | 5.1% | 7% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | -3.9% | 13.2% | 1% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | -3.2% | 6.0% | 22% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 122 reported | 38.1% | 55.3% | 26% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UEC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 68.4B THB (≈$1.9B) | 96 | 66 | |
| 4 | 31.65T IDR (≈$2.0B) | 96 | 53 | |
| 121 | 1.9B USD | 6 | 20 | |
| 122 | 1.9B USD | 5 | 49 | |
| 123 | 1.9B USD | 2 | 18 | |
| 123 | 5.3B USD | 2 | 11 | |
| 123 | 3.7B USD | 2 | 2 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score