Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.
How AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. stacks up
UAVS · against 25 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
1/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #23 of 26 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score10 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including UAVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 1?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -33.9% vs peer median 2.9%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on invested capital: -102.2% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 96% of peers. Operating margin: -69.8% vs peer median 6.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UAVS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UAVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 22 reported | -102.2% | -12.7% | 14% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 25 reported | -69.8% | -9.6% | 13% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 26 reported | -33.9% | -4.0% | 8% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 25 reported | -106.1% | -21.7% | 17% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 26 reported | 45.4% | 31.8% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UAVS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 68 | 72 | |
| 2 | 466M SEK (≈$47M) | 64 | 76 | |
| 3 | 60M MYR (≈$13M) | 62 | 62 | |
| 3 | 113M MYR (≈$25M) | 62 | 80 | |
| 5 | 45M EUR (≈$50M) | 58 | 82 | |
| 20 | 15M USD | 5 | 11 | |
| 22 | 223M HKD (≈$28M) | 4 | 50 | |
| 23 | 912M TWD (≈$28M) | 1 | 11 | |
| 23 | 39M USD | 1 | 12 | |
| 23 | 26M USD | 1 | 26 | |
| 26 | 149M SEK (≈$15M) | 0 | 6 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score