Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Under Armour, Inc.
How Under Armour, Inc. stacks up
UA · against 409 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #379 of 410 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score34 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including UA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 86% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -5.7% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 77% of peers. Revenue growth: -3.6% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 410 reported | -3.6% | 4.1% | 18% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 327 reported | Not reported | 7.5% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 406 reported | -5.7% | 5.2% | 8% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 3 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 3 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 34 | |
| 377 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 13 | 30 | |
| 379 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score