Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TXNM Energy, Inc.
How TXNM Energy, Inc. stacks up
TXNM · against 86 other Utilities companies of similar size
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #57 of 87 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including TXNM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Its metrics sit close to the Utilities norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -8.3% vs peer median 0.0%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 4.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.4% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TXNM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TXNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | 3.1% | 5.4% | 22% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 87 reported | 7.8% | 8.7% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | -7.8% | -0.7% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | 54.7% | 58.5% | 46% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TXNM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55.0B HKD (≈$7.0B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 1 | 8.54T CLP (≈$9.4B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 6.9B GBP (≈$9.0B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 45.8B HKD (≈$5.9B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 4 | 4.84T CLP (≈$5.3B) | 94 | 72 | |
| 53 | 48.3B BRL (≈$8.7B) | 43 | 69 | |
| 53 | 9.4B NZD (≈$5.6B) | 43 | 69 | |
| 55 | 6.3B USD | 42 | 38 | |
| 55 | 4.1B USD | 42 | 43 | |
| 57 | 6.4B USD | 41 | 45 | |
| 58 | 5.4B USD | 38 | 77 | |
| 59 | 4.6B EUR (≈$5.0B) | 37 | 43 | |
| 59 | 131.1B THB (≈$3.7B) | 37 | 38 | |
| 61 | 606.3B INR (≈$7.3B) | 36 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score