Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TXNM · against 86 other Utilities companies of similar size
Ranked #49 of 87 · scores higher than 44% of peers · safety percentile 44
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including TXNM · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker current ratio and debt / equity than most Utilities peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TXNM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 87 reported | 1.66× | 1.20× | 28% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 85 reported | 0.17 | 0.46 | 87% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 83 reported | 0.56× | 0.98× | 18% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.4B USD | 93 | 43 | |
| 2 | 29.9B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 92 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.4B USD | 91 | 31 | |
| 4 | 6.6B CHF (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 48 | |
| 5 | 9.1B NZD (≈$5.4B) | 89 | 70 | |
| 45 | 606.3B INR (≈$7.3B) | 51 | 48 | |
| 46 | 921.0B INR (≈$11.1B) | 47 | 60 | |
| 47 | 131.1B THB (≈$3.7B) | 46 | 38 | |
| 48 | 604.8B INR (≈$7.3B) | 45 | 53 | |
| 49 | 6.4B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 50 | 5.3B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 51 | 49.2B HKD (≈$6.3B) | 41 | 50 | |
| 51 | 59.6B CNY (≈$8.3B) | 41 | 44 | |
| 53 | 10.1B USD | 41 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score