Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ternium S.A.
How Ternium S.A. stacks up
TX · against 162 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
61/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #87 of 163 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score25 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -4.7% vs peer median 2.6%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 70% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.6% vs peer median 8.5%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.1% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 163 reported | 7.1% | 5.9% | 63% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 165 reported | 12.6% | 11.0% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | -4.7% | 5.2% | 11% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 156 reported | 121.3% | 48.1% | 94% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 155.7B ZAR (≈$8.6B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 1 | 5.3B USD | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 7.9B USD | 96 | 62 | |
| 3 | 226.1B THB (≈$6.3B) | 96 | 42 | |
| 5 | 87.3B HKD (≈$11.2B) | 95 | 72 | |
| 87 | 1.13T JPY (≈$7.7B) | 61 | 33 | |
| 87 | 43.8B CNY (≈$6.1B) | 61 | 63 | |
| 87 | 8.9B USD | 61 | 85 | |
| 87 | 20.8B CAD (≈$15.2B) | 61 | 74 | |
| 87 | 10.1B USD | 61 | 46 | |
| 92 | 2.39T JPY (≈$16.2B) | 60 | 58 | |
| 93 | 14.6B AUD (≈$9.6B) | 58 | 61 | |
| 93 | 5.9B USD | 58 | 53 | |
| 95 | 8.3B USD | 57 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score