Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ternium S.A.
How Ternium S.A. stacks up
TX · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #155 of 183 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including TX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: -11.6% vs peer median 3.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -1.7% vs peer median -0.0%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | -11.6% | 9.9% | 6% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | Not reported | 17.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | -1.7% | 1.5% | 35% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 151 | 8.1B USD | 27 | 19 | |
| 151 | 24.4B USD | 27 | 28 | |
| 151 | 912M USD | 27 | 25 | |
| 155 | 310M USD | 24 | 22 | |
| 155 | 10.1B USD | 24 | 46 | |
| 157 | 1.2B USD | 23 | 47 | |
| 157 | 8.8B USD | 23 | 24 | |
| 159 | 2.6B USD | 22 | 45 | |
| 159 | 9.1B USD | 22 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score