Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TWO · against 248 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #239 of 249 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)19 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including TWO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TWO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 246 reported | 3.79× | 0.83× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 246 reported | 1.05 | 0.66 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 250 reported | 0.22× | 1.16× | 7% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B SGD (≈$864M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.1B SGD (≈$813M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 3.3B SAR (≈$901M) | 99 | 70 | |
| 4 | 6.3B CNY (≈$876M) | 98 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1.1B SGD (≈$828M) | 98 | 31 | |
| 235 | 2.0B USD | 6 | 24 | |
| 236 | 8.2B HKD (≈$1.0B) | 5 | 9 | |
| 237 | 850M USD | 5 | 24 | |
| 238 | 708M USD | 5 | 58 | |
| 239 | 1.3B USD | 4 | 14 | |
| 240 | 996M USD | 3 | 53 | |
| 241 | 4.6B CNY (≈$645M) | 3 | 6 | |
| 242 | 6.3B HKD (≈$806M) | 3 | 3 | |
| 243 | 1.7B USD | 2 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score