Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Two Harbors Investment Corp
How Two Harbors Investment Corp stacks up
TWO · against 240 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #236 of 241 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including TWO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -77.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -34.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TWO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TWO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 244 reported | -77.5% | 4.3% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 165 reported | Not reported | 12.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 234 reported | -34.4% | 5.1% | 3% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TWO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 6.7B SAR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 53 | |
| 3 | 6.4B SAR (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 45 | |
| 3 | 946M USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 236 | 5.7B HKD (≈$724M) | 0 | 26 | |
| 236 | 6.3B HKD (≈$806M) | 0 | 3 | |
| 236 | 9.7B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 0 | 20 | |
| 236 | 4.6B CNY (≈$640M) | 0 | 14 | |
| 236 | 1.3B USD | 0 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score