Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Twin Disc, Incorporated
How Twin Disc, Incorporated stacks up
TWIN · against 770 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #282 of 771 · scores higher than 63% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score59 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TWIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.5% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.1% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 79% of peers. Earnings yield: 9.5% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TWIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TWIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 765 reported | 7.4% | 2.7% | 78% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 782 reported | 7.3% | 6.4% | 54% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 174 reported | 2.5% | 3.6% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 772 reported | 60.8% | 58.0% | 52% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TWIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 2.9B BRL (≈$517M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 275 | 553M USD | 66 | 72 | |
| 275 | 595M USD | 66 | 60 | |
| 282 | 2.4B CNY (≈$332M) | 65 | 75 | |
| 282 | 349M USD | 65 | 29 | |
| 282 | 364M USD | 65 | 71 | |
| 285 | 3.7B CNY (≈$519M) | 64 | 40 | |
| 285 | 298M CHF (≈$342M) | 64 | 23 | |
| 287 | 2.9B CNY (≈$401M) | 63 | 44 | |
| 287 | 16.5B TWD (≈$513M) | 63 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score