Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TWFG · against 105 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #17 of 106 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score11 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including TWFG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on assets, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
| Metric | TWFG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 101 reported | Not reported | 5.2% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 54 reported | 18.3% | 20.1% | 47% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 123 reported | 11.7% | 2.7% | 94% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 120 reported | 19.3% | 5.9% | 87% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 138 reported | 85.9% | 99.5% | 42% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 342M EUR (≈$376M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 3 | 527M AUD (≈$348M) | 97 | 64 | |
| 4 | 76.5B JPY (≈$520M) | 96 | 67 | |
| 5 | 323M EUR (≈$355M) | 93 | 59 | |
| 12 | 8.4B THB (≈$234M) | 84 | 60 | |
| 14 | 12.9B ZAR (≈$710M) | 82 | 69 | |
| 15 | 45.4B JPY (≈$309M) | 81 | 79 | |
| 15 | 685M USD | 81 | 68 | |
| 17 | 370M USD | 80 | 85 | |
| 18 | 350M USD | 77 | ||
| 18 | 6.7B SEK (≈$667M) | 77 | 74 | |
| 20 | 500M NZD (≈$300M) | 75 | 52 | |
| 21 | 1.0B AUD (≈$687M) | 73 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score