Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TV · against 141 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #83 of 142 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TV · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 132 reported | 0.79× | 0.29× | 31% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 139 reported | 1.03 | 0.66 | 19% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 138 reported | 2.40× | 1.41× | 75% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 2 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1.07T KRW (≈$770M) | 96 | 85 | |
| 4 | 1.90T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 29 | |
| 79 | 840M USD | 44 | 49 | |
| 80 | 10.1B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 43 | 29 | |
| 81 | 701M USD | 43 | 51 | |
| 82 | 4.2B CNY (≈$590M) | 41 | 45 | |
| 83 | 1.1B USD | 39 | 40 | |
| 84 | 544M EUR (≈$598M) | 38 | 33 | |
| 85 | 5.2B ILS (≈$1.4B) | 38 | 64 | |
| 86 | 17.2B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 37 | 60 | |
| 87 | 1.2B USD | 37 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score