Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TTM Technologies, Inc.
How TTM Technologies, Inc. stacks up
TTMI · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
48/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #243 of 497 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score58 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including TTMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -0.2% vs peer median 2.7%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TTMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 2.7% | 1.9% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 5.3% | 4.0% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | -0.2% | 3.3% | 20% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 21.7% | 22.1% | 49% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TTMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 237 | 47.5B USD | 49 | 39 | |
| 243 | 2.7B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 243 | 2.4B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 243 | 518M USD | 48 | 51 | |
| 243 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 54 | |
| 243 | 33.0B USD | 48 | 74 | |
| 248 | 3.0B USD | 47 | 50 | |
| 248 | 714M USD | 47 | 21 | |
| 248 | 608M USD | 47 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score