Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TETRA Technologies, Inc.
How TETRA Technologies, Inc. stacks up
TTI · against 100 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #62 of 101 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including TTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -95.1% vs peer median 1.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.7% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 2.0% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 103 reported | 5.7% | -2.7% | 67% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 68 reported | -95.1% | -8.6% | 3% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 100 reported | 2.0% | -2.0% | 64% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TTI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 4 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 57 | |
| 57 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.7B) | 39 | 69 | |
| 59 | 1.5B USD | 37 | 12 | |
| 60 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 36 | 39 | |
| 60 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 36 | 35 | |
| 62 | 881M USD | 32 | 31 | |
| 63 | 4.2B CNY (≈$595M) | 29 | 28 | |
| 64 | 6.6B CNY (≈$929M) | 28 | 35 | |
| 64 | 5.0B NOK (≈$477M) | 28 | 34 | |
| 66 | 1.2B USD | 25 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score