Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Titan America SA
How Titan America SA stacks up
TTAM · against 359 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
76/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #84 of 360 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score41 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including TTAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.3% vs peer median 2.6%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 3.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TTAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 354 reported | 7.0% | 4.7% | 71% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 366 reported | 11.8% | 9.7% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 97 reported | 6.1% | 3.9% | 71% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 346 reported | 43.2% | 56.9% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TTAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 2.73T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2.6B USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 4 | 69.8B ZAR (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 4 | 4.7B AUD (≈$3.1B) | 98 | 87 | |
| 84 | 564.9B JPY (≈$3.8B) | 76 | 54 | |
| 84 | 288.5B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 76 | 70 | |
| 84 | 3.7B USD | 76 | 49 | |
| 84 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 76 | 52 | |
| 84 | 2.5B USD | 76 | 74 | |
| 89 | 19.1B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 75 | 58 | |
| 89 | 13.8B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 75 | 61 | |
| 89 | 190.6B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 75 | 63 | |
| 89 | 303.2B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 75 | 70 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score