Ranked #69 of 364 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
40 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TTAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Lower relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 78 among Basic Materials companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 63% of peers. Debt / equity: 0.38× vs peer median 0.36×
●Beta is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 61% of peers. Current ratio: 3.03× vs peer median 1.76×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
TTAM
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 358 reported
0.53×
0.40×
38%
33%
BetaLower is better · 354 reported
Not reported
0.74
—
—
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 343 reported
2.08×
1.73×
64%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
