Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Titan America SA
How Titan America SA stacks up
TTAM · against 349 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #168 of 350 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score33 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including TTAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.8% vs peer median 3.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.1% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TTAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 354 reported | 1.8% | 4.5% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 253 reported | 12.1% | 13.2% | 49% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 345 reported | 6.9% | 1.1% | 69% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TTAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 2 | 11.8B HKD (≈$1.5B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 4.2B CAD (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 4 | 3.3B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 4 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 163 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 59 | 70 | |
| 168 | 12.6B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 58 | 40 | |
| 168 | 147.4B INR (≈$1.8B) | 58 | 70 | |
| 168 | 3.2B USD | 58 | 57 | |
| 168 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 74 | |
| 172 | 10.9B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 57 | 56 | |
| 172 | 400.2B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 57 | 67 | |
| 172 | 303.2B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 57 | 70 | |
| 172 | 4.2B USD | 57 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score