Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Titan America SA
How Titan America SA stacks up
TTAM · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
58/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #111 of 183 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including TTAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.8% vs peer median 3.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 12.1% vs peer median 9.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TTAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TTAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 1.8% | 9.9% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | 12.1% | 17.1% | 48% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 6.9% | 1.5% | 65% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TTAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 108 | 8.1B USD | 59 | 66 | |
| 108 | 36.9B USD | 59 | 52 | |
| 111 | 3.2B USD | 58 | 57 | |
| 111 | 15.8B USD | 58 | 40 | |
| 111 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 74 | |
| 114 | 4.2B USD | 57 | 25 | |
| 114 | 85.4B USD | 57 | 46 | |
| 116 | 235.8B USD | 56 | 51 | |
| 116 | 1.8B USD | 56 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score