Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tesla, Inc.
How Tesla, Inc. stacks up
TSLA · against 1 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
39/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 2 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score1 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including TSLA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 89% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -47.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 78% of peers. Revenue growth: 11.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TSLA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TSLA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2 reported | 11.8% | 13.8% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 2 reported | -47.2% | 21.1% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2 reported | 3.3% | 8.1% | 0% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TSLA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.80T USD | 89 | 58 | |
| 2 | 1.49T USD | 39 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score