Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TSAT · against 462 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #463 of 463 · scores higher than 0% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)43 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including TSAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TSAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 452 reported | 3.24× | 0.23× | 2% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 443 reported | 2.05 | 0.88 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 458 reported | 0.17× | 1.89× | 0% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 459 | 1.1B USD | 1 | 38 | |
| 460 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 2.8B USD |
| 1 |
| 35 |
| 461 | 2.1B USD | 1 | 34 |
| 462 | 2.4B USD | 1 | 29 |
| 463 | 2.1B USD | 1 | 9 |